Hotline: 585-346-6021
Home / Adjudication Panel

THE JURY BOARD & SELECTION PROTOCOL

A global selection panel composed of respected, admired, and extraordinary leaders who have made monumental contributions to the ethical field globally.

Official Confidentiality Statement

Protection of Impartiality & Strict Non-Disclosure

A global selection panel and advisors consist of respected, admired, and extraordinary individuals who have made extraordinary contributions to the ethical field globally — thinkers, jurists, and front-line activists who are so ethically sound and lead their lives with moral values from around the world.

“We do not disclose information pertaining to the selection process, and all information pertaining to deliberations, scoring, and candidate evaluations is strictly confidential.”

This protocol ensures that jurors remain shielded from external political leverage, public relations campaigns, commercial interests, or coercion. Each juror votes based on unadulterated evidence of moral integrity and community impact.

Board Composition

Distinguished Adjudicators

Hon. Lynn S. Adelman
Global Judicial Ethics Panel

Hon. Lynn S. Adelman

Senior Jurist & International Jurisprudence Advisor

Distinguished jurist with over four decades of service defending constitutional safeguards, equal access to justice, and judicial impartiality.

Status: Active Global Juror
Dr. Bebarly Rogers
The Rogers Foundations & Ethics Trustee Council

Dr. Bebarly Rogers

Chairman of the Board

Visionary philanthropist championing educational reform, civic integrity, and moral curriculum development across underserved global communities.

Status: Active Global Juror
Prof. Jonathan Vance
Center for Global Ethical Governance

Prof. Jonathan Vance

Senior Fellow of Comparative Moral Philosophy

Leading academic scholar specializing in institutional ethics, anti-corruption frameworks, and philosophical foundations of human rights.

Status: Active Global Juror

The 4 Adjudication Metrics

1. MORAL FORTITUDE

Steadfastness in doing what is right in the face of financial, personal, or legal adversity.

2. COMMUNITY TRUST

Verified confidence by peers, neighbors, or clients that the candidate is incapable of deceit.

3. REJECTION OF LUST

Deliberate refusal to participate in exploitative, vulgar, or usurious opportunities for wealth.

4. ENDURING LEGACY

Measurable elevation of moral norms within their profession, classroom, or public square.